Submit ZIP Code

Got a Quick Question?

(120 characters remaining)
100% Anonymous. Free Answers.

R. Kelly Legal Strategy Shows the Difference a Skilled Criminal Defense Attorney Can Make

The legal saga surrounding R&B singer R. Kelly has been going on for years, but for those sure it would never end, news of closure has finally arrived. As newspapers around the country noted last week, a jury took less than one day to return a verdict of not guilty on all fourteen counts of producing child pornography, stemming from a video released that showed Kelly engaging in sexual acts with a girl who appeared to be underage at the time, possibly as young as 13 years old.

While Kelly has managed to evade going to trial several times over the six years since the Chicago Sun-Times was sent a copy of the video used in evidence against Kelly, the result of this trial confirmed the strategy used by his defense lawyers. While criminal defense attorney Edward Genson could have moved for a mistrial when prosecutors admitted that a DVD copy of the infamous video was slightly different than the original when earlier they had claimed it was not, he chose to proceed instead, confident that their case was moving forward in a positive manner.

Genson’s defense was built on his belief that the identity of the girl in the videotape could not be definitively proven from seeing it. The alleged victim and her parents have denied that the girl on the tape is her, while Kelly has also denied that he is the man in the video. Yet more than fifteen witnesses positively identified the girl, and ten positively identified Kelly.

Despite this, Genson and his associates were able to plant the seed of doubt in the minds of the jury members, allowing them to judge with their own eyes whether or not the tape portrayed Kelly and the girl in question. The jury deliberated, and agreed that despite the testimony identifying the two, it was not possible to be completely sure of their identities.

One crucial element to the case that likely had an impact on the jury decision was Judge Vincent Gaughan’s ruling that the jury be barred from learning of Kelly’s history with younger women. This past includes settlements he made with three underage girls for allegations of sexual misconduct, as well as his secret marriage to R&B singer Aaliyah when she was only 15.

Kelly’s other lawyers worked hard to find approaches that led to Kelly’s acquittal as well, including the pop culture references and courtroom antics of Sam Adam Jr., whose father, Sam Adam Sr., also worked as a defense lawyer on Kelly’s team. Adam Jr. made reference to Gary Coleman, the Wayans Brothers’ film White Chicks, TV’s “The Office” as well as Hannah Montana. It’s an unconventional approach, but Adam Jr. believed that it gave him a way to relate to members of the jury that other lawyers didn’t have.

However, it’s clear from the outcome that not just style but substance gave Kelly his freedom. Led by Edward Genson, Kelly’s team of lawyers expertly cast doubt on the testimony of the witnesses on the stand, making sure that no member of the jury could consciously convict without being 100% sure of Kelly’s guilt. And when they couldn’t reach that level of certainty, they took the only legal course they could and acquitted.


PAID ATTORNEY ADVERTISEMENT: THIS WEB SITE IS A GROUP ADVERTISEMENT AND THE PARTICIPATING ATTORNEYS ARE INCLUDED BECAUSE THEY PAY AN ADVERTISING FEE. It is not a lawyer referral service or prepaid legal services plan. Total Criminal Defense is not a law firm. Your request for contact will be forwarded to the local lawyer who has paid to advertise in the ZIP code you provide. Total Criminal Defense does not endorse or recommend any lawyer or law firm who participates in the network. It does not make any representation and has not made any judgment as to the qualifications, expertise or credentials of any participating lawyer. No representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers. The information contained herein is not legal advice. Any information you submit to Total Criminal Defense may not be protected by attorney-client privilege. All photos are of models and do not depict clients. All case evaluations are performed by participating attorneys. An attorney responsible for the content of this Site is Kevin W. Chern, Esq., licensed in Illinois with offices at 25 East Washington, Suite 510, Chicago, Illinois 60602. To see the attorney in your area who is responsible for this advertisement, please click here or call 866-200-8052.

FLORIDA ONLY: Total Criminal Defense is considered a lawyer referral service in the state of Florida under the Florida Rules of Professional Conduct. By all other standards, Total Criminal Defense is a group advertisement and not a lawyer referral service.

If you live in Florida, Mississippi, Missouri, New York or Wyoming, please click here