Former Teacher Argues that Custodial Sexual Battery Conviction Does Not Make the Grade

William Tinsley, a 28-year old former teacher, is waging a battle to have his conviction for custodial sexual battery dropped.

Tinsley was convicted of custodial sexual battery for allegedly fondling a 16 year-old in his home.

According to Tinsley's criminal defense attorney, he and the alleged victim were not at school at the time the supposed fondling occurred.

Therefore, he could not be found guilty of custodial sexual battery because the alleged sexual activity did not take place on school property.

Title XLVI of the Florida Statutes addresses sexual battery. In this section the applicable statute states that custodial sexual battery is committed when a person in a position of control or authority in a probation, community control, controlled release, detention, custodial, or similar setting, acts in such a manner as to lead the victim to reasonably believe that the offender is in a position of control or authority as an agent or employee of government.

The Florida Supreme Court was presented with the issue of the applicability of custodial sexual battery, as it related to a teacher, in the case of Hallberg v. State, 649 So.2d 1355 (Fla. 1994).

In this case, the Florida Supreme Court overturned a lower court's decision that James Hallberg was guilty of custodial sexual battery when sexual acts between Hallberg and the victim occurred outside the regular school year and not on school property.

The Court specifically addressed the application of the phrase a "person who stands in a position of familial or custodial authority to a child." The Court found "that a teacher, without any teaching responsibility or extracurricular activity supervisory authority over a child during a summer recess, is not in a position of custodial authority."

While the ruling in Hallberg is not dispositive in Tinsley's case, it could provide strong precedent for adjudication in Tinsley's appeal when the judge decides whether or not to allow the charge to stand.

Related Sex Crime Articles:


» Back to Criminal Defense Articles

PAID ATTORNEY ADVERTISEMENT.This Web site is a group advertisement. It is not a lawyer referral service or prepaid legal services plan. Total Criminal Defense is not a law firm. The sole basis for the inclusion of the participating lawyers or law firms is the payment of a fee for exclusive geographical advertising rights. Total Criminal Defense does not endorse or recommend any lawyer or law firm who participates in the network. It does not make any representation and has not made any judgment as to the qualifications, expertise or credentials of any participating lawyer. The information contained herein is not legal advice. Any information you submit to Total Criminal Defense may not be protected by attorney-client privilege. All photos are of models and do not depict clients. All case evaluations are performed by participating attorneys. An attorney responsible for the content of this Site is Kevin W. Chern, Esq., licensed in Illinois with offices at 25 East Washington, Suite 510, Chicago, Illinois 60602. To see the attorney in your area who is responsible for this advertisement, please click here

If you live in Alabama, Florida, Missouri, New York or Wyoming, please click here