Marijuana Vending Machines Raise Legal Questions

Though the federal government of the United States does not recognize any legal use for marijuana, 11 states have legalized its use for medical purposes. In recent months, controversy has emerged over which laws citizens are expected to follow, those of the state or those of the country.

The latest battle over the legalization of pot is set in Los Angeles, where the introduction of marijuana vending machines has provided debaters with new fuel for their fire. According to the Chicago Tribune, the inventor of the machines, Vincent Mehdizadeh, has touted them as promoting convenience, lowered prices, safety and anonymity for users.

Because the PVMs (prescription vending machines) reportedly operate in stores manned only by one employee (a security guard), fewer people need to be paid to work, hence prices are lowered. And because of the machines' stringent identification requirements, the likelihood of pot getting into the wrong hands is lowered.

BBC News reports that patients who use the marijuana dispensary machines must register a fingerprint, provide a photo ID and use a pre-paid card to operate the machines. Every time a patient makes a purchase, his image is recorded by the machine.

In other words, the PVMs, which evidently took seven months to develop and produce, utilize several safety and security features.

Though the machines have received ardent praise from supporters of legalized medical marijuana, their future could be cloudy. Since the passage of the Controlled Substances Act in 1970, marijuana has been a banned substance in the United States.

A California court decided earlier this year that federal anti-drug laws trump the more permissive state laws. In that case, a man had filed suit for being fired after his drug test came back positive for THC, the active chemical in marijuana. The man had apparently told his boss about his medical marijuana use.

But, in the eyes of the federal government, possession and distribution remain criminally punishable offenses. Those who sell marijuana to patients with a doctor's recommendation risk being charged with felonies if the Drug Enforcement Administration conducts a raid on their property.

And those who employ known drug users could face penalties, too.

If a lawsuit is brought against those who produce, stock or manage the PVMs, the machines' viability could be questioned and a lot of people could end up facing criminal charges.

Ironically, despite the controversy surrounding the use of vending machines to distribute weed, some industry insiders have apparently expressed enthusiasm for the concept of the PVM. Evidently, some people believe the concept will be used to sell less controversial medication across the country in the not-too-distant future.


» Back to Criminal Defense Articles

PAID ATTORNEY ADVERTISEMENT.This Web site is a group advertisement. It is not a lawyer referral service or prepaid legal services plan. Total Criminal Defense is not a law firm. The sole basis for the inclusion of the participating lawyers or law firms is the payment of a fee for exclusive geographical advertising rights. Total Criminal Defense does not endorse or recommend any lawyer or law firm who participates in the network. It does not make any representation and has not made any judgment as to the qualifications, expertise or credentials of any participating lawyer. The information contained herein is not legal advice. Any information you submit to Total Criminal Defense may not be protected by attorney-client privilege. All photos are of models and do not depict clients. All case evaluations are performed by participating attorneys. An attorney responsible for the content of this Site is Kevin W. Chern, Esq., licensed in Illinois with offices at 25 East Washington, Suite 510, Chicago, Illinois 60602. To see the attorney in your area who is responsible for this advertisement, please click here

If you live in Alabama, Florida, Missouri, New York or Wyoming, please click here